Enrollment and program performance review
North Shore MMA
A review of a multi-age martial arts program facing a steep year-over-year enrollment decline and rising class cancellations.
- -31%
- Annual registrations
- 842 projected, down from 1,216
- -41%
- New learners
- Acquisition fell fastest, before trial
- 52
- Weekly classes
- Up from 41 while enrollment declined
Context
A community martial arts school running children's, youth and adult programs saw registrations fall across every age group while the weekly schedule kept growing. Leadership had several competing explanations: pricing, competition, scheduling, marketing, instructor changes and program quality.
Question
What should the organization change before the next registration cycle to address the decline?
Approach
- Treated each leadership explanation as a hypothesis to test
- Reviewed four years of registration, capacity, tuition and cancellation data
- Traced the path from website visit to trial inquiry, attended trial and paid registration
- Compared retention by age group and reviewed available withdrawal reasons
- Scanned local pricing and program structure for comparison
- Stated the limits of the evidence: withdrawal reasons existed for only 41% of departing learners
Deliverables
- Executive summary with one overall finding and five ranked priorities
- Funnel analysis showing where prospective learners were lost before trial
- Retention analysis by age group with known withdrawal reasons
- Capacity analysis showing how the schedule amplified the decline
- Financial implication model and a 90-day implementation sequence
- A short measure set for the next registration cycle
Findings
1.The decline was an acquisition problem, not a quality problem
New registrations fell 41% while returning learners held steady at 74% term-over-term. Trial-to-paid conversion stayed at 68%, in line with the four-year average.
2.Most prospective learners were lost before the trial
Of 1,040 website visits to the trial page, 214 submitted an inquiry and 96 attended a trial. The inquiry form asked for 11 fields and responses took an average of 2.6 days.
3.The schedule amplified the decline
52 weekly classes ran at 47% average capacity. Eleven sections held four or fewer learners, and those sections accounted for 68% of cancellations.
4.Price was not the barrier
Tuition sat mid-range against five comparable local schools; the two cheaper schools were also losing enrollment.
5.Consolidation protected revenue
Merging eleven under-filled sections modelled a $34,000 annual instructional saving with no learner displacement, funding a simplified intake and a re-registration push.
Use
The organization could stabilize the existing program before adding offerings or changing price: simplify the path into a trial, consolidate under-filled sections, make re-registration an active part of the term, and collect consistent exit data.
Reflection
The review recommended against a curriculum redesign. Learner satisfaction was strong and trial-to-paid conversion had held. Naming what is not the problem is part of the work.
This example is illustrative. The organization, data and findings are fictional and are used to show the structure and level of analysis of a Common Thread engagement.
A similar question about your own program?
Send a project inquiry